Slurm Overview
This document explains how Torc simplifies running workflows on Slurm-based HPC systems. The key insight is that you don't need to understand Slurm schedulers or workflow actions to run workflows on HPC systems—Torc handles this automatically.
The Simple Approach
Running a workflow on Slurm requires just two things:
- Define your jobs with resource requirements
- Submit with
slurm generate+submit
That's it. Torc will analyze your workflow, generate appropriate Slurm configurations, and submit everything for execution.
⚠️ Important: The
slurm generate+submitcommand uses heuristics to auto-generate Slurm schedulers and workflow actions. For complex workflows with unusual dependency patterns, the generated configuration may not be optimal and could result in suboptimal allocation timing. Always preview the configuration first usingtorc slurm generate(see Previewing Generated Configuration) before submitting production workflows.
Example Workflow
Here's a complete workflow specification that runs on Slurm:
name: data_analysis_pipeline
description: Analyze experimental data with preprocessing, training, and evaluation
resource_requirements:
- name: light
num_cpus: 4
memory: 8g
runtime: PT30M
- name: compute
num_cpus: 32
memory: 64g
runtime: PT2H
- name: gpu
num_cpus: 16
num_gpus: 2
memory: 128g
runtime: PT4H
jobs:
- name: preprocess
command: python preprocess.py --input data/ --output processed/
resource_requirements: light
- name: train_model
command: python train.py --data processed/ --output model/
resource_requirements: gpu
depends_on: [preprocess]
- name: evaluate
command: python evaluate.py --model model/ --output results/
resource_requirements: compute
depends_on: [train_model]
- name: generate_report
command: python report.py --results results/
resource_requirements: light
depends_on: [evaluate]
Submitting the Workflow
torc slurm generate writes the augmented spec to stdout, so pipe it straight into torc submit -:
torc slurm generate --account myproject workflow.yaml | torc submit -
Or save the generated spec to a file and submit that file:
torc slurm generate --account myproject -o workflow_with_slurm.yaml workflow.yaml
torc submit workflow_with_slurm.yaml
Torc will:
- Detect which HPC system you're on (e.g., NLR Kestrel)
- Match each job's requirements to appropriate partitions
- Generate Slurm scheduler configurations
- Create workflow actions that stage resource allocation based on dependencies
- Submit the workflow for execution
How It Works
When you use slurm generate + submit, Torc performs intelligent analysis of your workflow:
1. Per-Job Scheduler Generation
Each job gets its own Slurm scheduler configuration based on its resource requirements. This means:
- Jobs are matched to the most appropriate partition
- Memory, CPU, and GPU requirements are correctly specified
- Walltime is set to the partition's maximum (explained below)
2. Staged Resource Allocation
Torc analyzes job dependencies and creates staged workflow actions. Every scheduler is tied to
the jobs it runs via an on_jobs_ready action:
- Jobs without dependencies —
on_jobs_readygated on those (root) jobs. They are ready as soon as the workflow is initialized, so their resources are allocated immediately, just as the workflow starts. - Jobs with dependencies —
on_jobs_readygated on those jobs, so resources are allocated only when the jobs become ready to run.
This prevents wasting allocation time on resources that aren't needed yet. For example, in the workflow above:
preprocessresources are allocated at workflow start (it is a root job)train_modelresources are allocated whenpreprocesscompletesevaluateresources are allocated whentrain_modelcompletesgenerate_reportresources are allocated whenevaluatecompletes
Tying every scheduler to its jobs (rather than scheduling root jobs with on_workflow_start) also
makes re-runs work: if you reset a subset of jobs and reinitialize, only those jobs' actions are
re-armed, so a follow-up torc submit re-schedules exactly the jobs being re-run. See
Re-running part of a workflow below.
3. Walltime Calculation
By default, Torc sets the walltime to 1.5× your longest job's runtime (capped at the partition's maximum). This provides headroom for jobs that run slightly longer than expected.
You can customize this behavior:
--walltime-strategy max-job-runtime(default): Uses longest job runtime × multiplier--walltime-strategy max-partition-time: Uses the partition's maximum walltime--walltime-multiplier 2.0: Change the safety multiplier (default: 1.5)
See Walltime Strategy Options for details.
4. HPC Profile Knowledge
Torc includes built-in knowledge of HPC systems like NLR Kestrel, including:
- Available partitions and their resource limits
- GPU configurations
- Memory and CPU specifications
- Special requirements (e.g., minimum node counts for high-bandwidth partitions)
Using an unsupported HPC? Please request built-in support so everyone benefits. You can also create a custom profile for immediate use.
Resource Requirements Specification
Resource requirements are the key to the simplified workflow. Define them once and reference them from jobs:
resource_requirements:
- name: small
num_cpus: 4
num_gpus: 0
num_nodes: 1
memory: 8g
runtime: PT1H
- name: gpu_training
num_cpus: 32
num_gpus: 4
num_nodes: 1
memory: 256g
runtime: PT8H
Fields
| Field | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
name | Reference name for jobs | "compute" |
num_cpus | CPU cores required | 32 |
num_gpus | GPUs required (0 if none) | 2 |
num_nodes | Nodes required | 1 |
memory | Memory with unit suffix | "64g", "512m" |
runtime | ISO8601 duration | "PT2H", "PT30M" |
Runtime Format
Use ISO8601 duration format:
PT30M— 30 minutesPT2H— 2 hoursPT1H30M— 1 hour 30 minutesP1D— 1 dayP2DT4H— 2 days 4 hours
Job Dependencies
Define dependencies explicitly or implicitly through file/data relationships:
Explicit Dependencies
jobs:
- name: step1
command: ./step1.sh
resource_requirements: small
- name: step2
command: ./step2.sh
resource_requirements: small
depends_on: [step1]
- name: step3
command: ./step3.sh
resource_requirements: small
depends_on: [step1, step2] # Waits for both
Implicit Dependencies (via Files)
files:
- name: raw_data
path: /data/raw.csv
- name: processed_data
path: /data/processed.csv
jobs:
- name: process
command: python process.py
input_files: [raw_data]
output_files: [processed_data]
resource_requirements: compute
- name: analyze
command: python analyze.py
input_files: [processed_data] # Creates implicit dependency on 'process'
resource_requirements: compute
Previewing Generated Configuration
Recommended Practice: Always preview the generated configuration before submitting to Slurm, especially for complex workflows. This allows you to verify that schedulers and actions are appropriate for your workflow structure.
Viewing the Execution Plan
Before generating schedulers, visualize how your workflow will execute in stages:
torc workflows execution-plan workflow.yaml
This shows the execution stages, which jobs run at each stage, and (if schedulers are defined) when Slurm allocations are requested. See Visualizing Workflow Structure for detailed examples.
Generating Slurm Configuration
Preview what Torc will generate:
torc slurm generate --account myproject --profile kestrel workflow.yaml
This outputs the complete workflow with generated schedulers and actions:
Scheduler Grouping Options
By default, Torc creates one scheduler per partition: jobs whose resource requirements would
land on the same partition share an allocation. So if three jobs have three different resource
requirement definitions (e.g., cpu, memory, mixed) but all fit on the same partition, you get
one scheduler instead of three.
The --group-by option controls how jobs are grouped into schedulers:
# Default: one scheduler per partition
torc slurm generate --account myproject workflow.yaml
torc slurm generate --account myproject --group-by partition workflow.yaml
# Result: 1 scheduler (short_scheduler) if all jobs fit on the "short" partition
# One scheduler per resource_requirements name
torc slurm generate --account myproject --group-by resource-requirements workflow.yaml
# Result: 3 schedulers (cpu_scheduler, memory_scheduler, mixed_scheduler)
When to use --group-by partition (default):
- Your workflow has resource requirement definitions that all fit on the same partition
- You want to minimize Slurm queue overhead by reducing the number of allocations
- Jobs have similar characteristics and can share nodes efficiently
When to use --group-by resource-requirements:
- Jobs have significantly different resource profiles that benefit from separate allocations
- You want fine-grained control over which jobs share resources
- You're debugging and want clear separation between job types
When grouping by partition, the scheduler uses the maximum resource values from all grouped requirements (max memory, max CPUs, max runtime, etc.) to ensure all jobs can run.
Walltime Strategy Options
The --walltime-strategy option controls how Torc calculates the walltime for generated schedulers:
# Default: use max job runtime with a safety multiplier (1.5x)
torc slurm generate --account myproject workflow.yaml
torc slurm generate --account myproject --walltime-strategy max-job-runtime workflow.yaml
# Use the partition's maximum allowed walltime
torc slurm generate --account myproject --walltime-strategy max-partition-time workflow.yaml
Walltime strategies:
| Strategy | Description |
|---|---|
max-job-runtime | Uses the longest job's runtime × multiplier (default: 1.5x). Capped at partition max. |
max-partition-time | Uses the partition's maximum walltime. More conservative but may impact queue scheduling. |
Customizing the multiplier:
The --walltime-multiplier option (default: 1.5) provides a safety margin when using
max-job-runtime:
# Use 2x the max job runtime for extra buffer
torc slurm generate --account myproject --walltime-multiplier 2.0 workflow.yaml
# Use exact job runtime (no buffer - use with caution)
torc slurm generate --account myproject --walltime-multiplier 1.0 workflow.yaml
When to use max-job-runtime (default):
- You want better queue scheduling (shorter walltime requests often get prioritized)
- Your job runtime estimates are reasonably accurate
- You prefer the Torc runner to exit early rather than holding idle allocations
When to use max-partition-time:
- Your job runtimes are highly variable or unpredictable
- You consistently underestimate job runtimes
- Queue priority is not a concern
name: data_analysis_pipeline
# ... original content ...
jobs:
- name: preprocess
command: python preprocess.py --input data/ --output processed/
resource_requirements: light
scheduler: preprocess_scheduler
# ... more jobs ...
slurm_schedulers:
- name: preprocess_scheduler
account: myproject
mem: 8g
nodes: 1
walltime: "04:00:00"
- name: train_model_scheduler
account: myproject
mem: 128g
nodes: 1
gres: "gpu:2"
walltime: "04:00:00"
# ... more schedulers ...
actions:
- trigger_type: on_jobs_ready
action_type: schedule_nodes
jobs: [preprocess]
scheduler: preprocess_scheduler
scheduler_type: slurm
num_allocations: 1
- trigger_type: on_jobs_ready
action_type: schedule_nodes
jobs: [train_model]
scheduler: train_model_scheduler
scheduler_type: slurm
num_allocations: 1
# ... more actions ...
Every scheduler is gated on the jobs it runs with on_jobs_ready — including root jobs like
preprocess, which are ready at workflow start. This is what makes a re-run reschedule only the
affected jobs.
Save the output to inspect or modify before submission:
torc slurm generate --account myproject workflow.yaml -o workflow_with_schedulers.yaml
Re-running part of a workflow
Because every scheduler is tied to its jobs with on_jobs_ready, you can re-run a subset of a
finished (or partially failed) workflow and have only the affected allocations re-submitted:
# Reset the jobs you want to re-run (downstream jobs reset automatically), then reinitialize:
torc jobs reset-status <id1> <id2> ... --reinit
# Re-submit: only the reset jobs' allocations are scheduled.
torc submit <workflow_id>
How it works: reinitialize re-arms only the actions whose jobs were reset; actions for untouched
jobs stay suppressed (so they are not re-scheduled and do not submit duplicate allocations).
torc submit then fires every pending schedule_nodes action — which is exactly the reset jobs'
actions. Downstream actions whose jobs aren't ready yet are fired later by a running worker, as
their dependencies complete.
For example, with separate job classes each on their own partition (see
examples/yaml/workflow_actions_multi_class_slurm.yaml),
resetting only the GPU and big-memory jobs re-schedules only the GPU and big-memory allocations; the
regular-job allocations are left alone.
Important —
submitdoes not right-size the re-run.torc submitre-fires each pending action with thenum_allocationsfrom its spec, verbatim. The granularity of a re-run is therefore the granularity of your actions:
- With per-stage / per-class actions (as above), resetting a subset re-arms only the matching actions, so
submitschedules only those — the common, efficient case.- With a single large fan-in action (e.g. one
on_jobs_readyaction gating 100k jobs withnum_allocations: 500), resetting any subset re-arms that one action, andsubmitsubmits its fullnum_allocations(500) — even if only 100 jobs need to re-run. The jobs still run (the surplus workers find no claimable work and idle out), but it badly over-allocates.For a right-sized partial re-run of a large fan-in stage, use
torc recoverinstead: it regeneratesschedule_nodesactions sized to the jobs that are actually pending (and suppresses the spec's full-size action), so it allocates for the 100 jobs rather than the whole stage.
Note:
torc submitis one-shot — it submits the currently-pending allocations and returns. For an unattended multi-stage re-run, follow it withtorc watchso that if every worker exits (e.g. Slurm walltime) before a later stage's action fires, the stranded action is picked up. For a guided re-run that also sizes allocations from prior runs, usetorc recover.
Tip: This is why auto-generated and recommended specs use
on_jobs_ready(tied to jobs) rather thanon_workflow_startforschedule_nodes. Anon_workflow_startaction is kept (not re-armed) on reinitialize andtorc submitcannot re-fire it, so a reset root job would have no allocation.on_workflow_startschedule_nodesis still fine for a single allocation that serves the whole workflow, but such an allocation isn't selectively re-run-safe.
Manually scheduling a re-run with torc slurm schedule-nodes
If you want to provide the compute yourself instead of letting submit fire the actions — for
example "run my 10 reset jobs on 1 node" — use torc slurm schedule-nodes:
torc jobs reset-status <id1> ... <id10> --reinit
torc slurm schedule-nodes -n1 <workflow_id>
A worker started this way still claims the workflow's own pending schedule_nodes actions and
submits their allocations. So if the reinit left a coarse action re-armed (e.g. an on_jobs_ready
action gating the whole stage), that worker would fire its full num_allocations on top of the one
you requested. To prevent surprises, schedule-nodes checks for pending schedule_nodes actions
and prompts you to suppress them, proceed (let them fire), or cancel. For non-interactive use:
--suppress-actions— mark the pending actions executed first, so only your-nrequest is submitted.--no-prompts— skip the prompt and proceed (let the actions fire); the historical behavior.
(torc recover does the suppression automatically and additionally right-sizes the allocation to
the pending jobs, so it is usually the better tool for a partial re-run.)
Choosing a stage's scheduler trigger: upstream vs. the stage's own jobs
For schedule_nodes, what you gate the action on determines how subset re-runs behave:
- Gate on the stage's own jobs (
on_jobs_ready[<this stage's jobs>]) — resetting any of them re-arms the action, sosubmitre-schedules them automatically. Best for per-class / per-stage actions where auto re-run at the action'snum_allocationsis what you want. - Gate on the upstream job whose completion unlocks the stage (
on_jobs_complete[<upstream>]) — resetting the stage's own jobs leaves the upstream terminal, so the action stays suppressed and does not re-fire. Best for a large fan-in stage you expect to re-run in subsets: the coarse action won't over-allocate, and you provide the compute withtorc slurm schedule-nodesortorc recover. The trade-off is that reinit won't auto-reschedule the reset jobs — which for a coarse stage is what you want anyway.
Torc Server Considerations
The Torc server must be accessible to compute nodes. Options include:
- Shared server (Recommended): A team member allocates a dedicated server in the HPC environment
- Login node: Suitable for small workflows with few, long-running jobs
For large workflows with many short jobs, a dedicated server prevents overloading login nodes.
Best Practices
1. Focus on Resource Requirements
Spend time accurately defining resource requirements. Torc handles the rest:
resource_requirements:
# Be specific about what each job type needs
- name: io_heavy
num_cpus: 4
memory: 32g # High memory for data loading
runtime: PT1H
- name: compute_heavy
num_cpus: 64
memory: 16g # Less memory, more CPU
runtime: PT4H
2. Use Meaningful Names
Name resource requirements by their purpose, not by partition:
# Good - describes the workload
resource_requirements:
- name: data_preprocessing
- name: model_training
- name: inference
# Avoid - ties you to specific infrastructure
resource_requirements:
- name: short_partition
- name: gpu_h100
3. Group Similar Jobs
Jobs with similar requirements can share resource requirement definitions:
resource_requirements:
- name: quick_task
num_cpus: 2
memory: 4g
runtime: PT15M
jobs:
- name: validate_input
command: ./validate.sh
resource_requirements: quick_task
- name: check_output
command: ./check.sh
resource_requirements: quick_task
depends_on: [main_process]
4. Test Locally First
Validate your workflow logic locally before submitting to HPC:
# Run locally (without Slurm)
torc run workflow.yaml
# Then submit to HPC
torc slurm generate --account myproject workflow.yaml | torc submit -
Limitations and Caveats
The auto-generation in torc slurm generate uses heuristics that work well for common workflow
patterns but may not be optimal for all cases:
When Auto-Generation Works Well
- Linear pipelines: A → B → C → D
- Fan-out patterns: One job unblocks many (e.g., preprocess → 100 work jobs)
- Fan-in patterns: Many jobs unblock one (e.g., 100 work jobs → postprocess)
- Simple DAGs: Clear dependency structures with distinct resource tiers
When to Use Manual Configuration
Consider using torc slurm generate to preview and manually adjust, or define schedulers manually,
when:
- Complex dependency graphs: Multiple interleaved dependency patterns
- Shared schedulers: You want multiple jobs to share the same Slurm allocation
- Custom timing: Specific requirements for when allocations should be requested
- Resource optimization: Fine-tuning to minimize allocation waste
- Multi-node jobs: Jobs requiring coordination across multiple nodes (see Multi-Node Jobs)
What Could Go Wrong
Without previewing, auto-generation might:
- Request allocations too early: Wasting queue time waiting for dependencies
- Request allocations too late: Adding latency to job startup
- Create suboptimal scheduler groupings: Not sharing allocations when beneficial
- Miss optimization opportunities: Not recognizing patterns that could share resources
Dynamic Jobs (spawn_jobs)
torc slurm generate analyzes the static workflow specification — the jobs declared at workflow
creation. Jobs added at runtime by spawn_jobs (the
dynamic-jobs orchestrator pattern) are by definition not visible to it, so the generated schedulers
allocate compute capacity only for the originally-declared workload.
For iterative workflows that grow at runtime, pair torc slurm generate with
torc watch --auto-schedule.
The watch loop detects spawned jobs (rows with origin = 'spawn') and submits additional Slurm
allocations to cover them — without it, spawned children sit Ready until the originally-planned
allocations happen to have spare capacity.
Best Practice: For production workflows, always run torc slurm generate first, review the
output, and submit the reviewed configuration with torc submit.
Advanced: Manual Scheduler Configuration
For advanced users who need fine-grained control, you can define schedulers and actions manually. See Advanced Slurm Configuration for details.
Common reasons for manual configuration:
- Non-standard partition requirements
- Custom Slurm directives (e.g.,
--constraint) - Multi-node jobs with specific topology requirements
- Reusing allocations across multiple jobs for efficiency
Troubleshooting
"No partition found for job"
Your resource requirements exceed what's available. Check:
- Memory doesn't exceed partition limits
- Runtime doesn't exceed partition walltime
- GPU count is available on GPU partitions
Use torc hpc partitions <profile> to see available resources.
Jobs Not Starting
Ensure the Torc server is accessible from compute nodes:
# From a compute node
curl $TORC_API_URL/health
Wrong Partition Selected
Use torc hpc match to see which partitions match your requirements:
torc hpc match kestrel --cpus 32 --memory 64g --walltime 02:00:00 --gpus 2
See Also
- Visualizing Workflow Structure — Execution plans and DAG visualization
- HPC Profiles — Detailed HPC profile usage
- Advanced Slurm Configuration — Manual Slurm scheduler setup
- Resource Requirements Reference — Complete specification
- Workflow Actions — Understanding actions